The Senate voted 49-44 to confirm Ratcliffe as Trump’s second permanent director of national intelligence, with all Democrats opposed. The vote along straight party lines was a first for a position created after the September 2001 terrorist attacks — before Thursday, there were never more than a dozen senators who voted against a nominee for director of national intelligence.
Trump initially picked Ratcliffe last year to be his spy chief following Ratcliffe’s aggressive questioning of former special counsel Robert Mueller, and Trump’s decision to re-nominate Ratcliffe this year came after he was a key defender of the President during the House’s impeachment proceedings.
In his new post, Ratcliffe will play an essential role in deciding what documents are released publicly in the middle of an election amid expanding congressional investigations that are targeting Obama administration officials and Trump’s 2020 opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden.
Ratcliffe will also be leading the intelligence community’s response to Russian election meddling in the 2020 election. Ratcliffe has been unequivocal that he believes Russia has interfered in US elections and will continue to do so — but he has not sided with one of the intelligence community’s key findings: that Russia was trying to help Trump in 2016. And Ratcliffe’s criticisms of the Ukraine whistleblower during Trump’s impeachment have prompted questions from Democrats about a chilling effect on watchdogs in the intelligence community.
Ratcliffe will also now be a key decision-maker on reorganizing of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence after outgoing acting director Richard Grenell began an overhaul during his short tenure.
When Trump nominated Ratcliffe in 2019, he said he had done so because the intelligence community had “run amok.” Ratcliffe withdrew last year amid questions about exaggerations to his resume and his partisan record, but Trump’s views on the intelligence community have only hardened since Trump picked Ratcliffe a second time in February.
A CNN review of Ratcliffe’s testimony, television interviews and participation in the House’s impeachment proceedings provides clues as to how Ratcliffe will approach the numerous politically sensitive issues he faces at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
“You know all of the experience in the world isn’t helpful without judgment, and I think what we’ve seen is that some of our most experienced intelligence officials have gotten it wrong with respect to important issues,” Ratcliffe said.
At his confirmation hearing, Ratcliffe pledged to be an independent voice delivering intelligence assessments to the President, even those Trump doesn’t want to hear. But Democrats say they remain skeptical that Ratcliffe will shed his partisan record on the Russia investigation and election meddling when he joins the Trump administration.
“He gave carefully crafted answers, not answers that at least left me with the notion that he’s going to protect the community that’s currently under assault,” said Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the panel’s top Democrat.
A fight over declassification
Ratcliffe’s nomination came after Trump Grenell, the acting director and a fierce Trump loyalist, as acting director in February. Grenell has provided Congress with multiple newly declassified documents related to the FBI’s Russia investigation and the prosecution of Flynn, Trump’s first national security adviser.
Grenell, who is also the US ambassador to Germany, has been assailed by Democrats for politicizing intelligence and providing fodder for the White House and the Trump campaign to attack Biden and former President Barack Obama of an unnamed crime.
The documents Grenell declassified included a memo Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice sent to herself and the list of more than three dozen individuals in the Obama administration who made “unmasking” requests during the Trump transition, where certain authorized US officials can request to view the names of Americans in foreign intelligence reports who are hidden.
Grenell’s time at ODNI may be running short, but the requests from members of Congress are not. This week, GOP Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Chuck Grassley of Iowa asked Grenell to provide them with additional names of officials in the Obama administration who made “unmasking” requests that involved members of the Trump campaign.
Ratcliffe has been deeply involved in questioning the FBI’s Russia investigation. He was one of the key lawmakers holding depositions during the House Republican probe in 2018 and was one of the first lawmakers to view the classified Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants on Trump adviser Carter Page.
“What we have been told over and over again, the Trump-Russia investigation, beginning in July of 2016, when there’s very clearly evidence of activity before that that involves law enforcement and intelligence community assets,” Ratcliffe told Fox in February.
Much of Ratcliffe’s attacks on the Russia probe have been focused on FBI officials like former Director James Comey and problems with the opposition research dossier on Trump and Russia — as well as going after House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, a California Democrat who leads the House’s oversight of the intelligence community Ratcliffe will now lead.
Asked at his confirmation hearing if he agreed that the intelligence community had “run amok,” Ratcliffe said he did not.
Questioning intel on Russian meddling
Ratcliffe testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee just days after the panel had released a bipartisan report affirming the 2017 Intelligence Community assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election with a goal of helping Trump win.
The assessment was notably at odds with Trump’s deep skepticism that Russia interfered — and the Republican House Intelligence Committee report from 2018 that questioned the intelligence community’s assessment that Russia preferred Trump in 2016.
Ratcliffe sought to walk a fine line between the two positions, agreeing that Russia interfered but declining repeatedly to weigh in on what Russia’s goals were.
“I was not on the committee at that time. I respect both committees, but I have not seen the underlying intelligence to tell me why there is a difference of opinion between the two committees,” Ratcliffe said.
Ratcliffe will also be in charge of the declassification of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s final installment of its three-year investigation into Russia election interference. The volume, which totals roughly 1,000 pages, details the committee’s counterintelligence investigation and contacts between Trump’s team and Russian officials during the election.
“I will work with you to get that declassified as expeditiously as possible,” Ratcliffe said.
Ratcliffe accused Ukraine whistleblower of lying
Ratcliffe was one of Trump’s most vocal defenders during last year’s House impeachment hearings, serving on both the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees.
In that role, Ratcliffe questioned the anonymous whistleblower complaint alleging Trump solicited election help form Ukraine while withholding US security assistance, accusing the whistleblower of providing false statements to the inspector general.
“The President didn’t get caught. The whistleblower got caught. The whistleblower made false statements. The whistleblower got caught with Chairman Schiff,” Ratcliffe said at a December 2019 Judiciary Committee hearing ahead of a panel vote on the articles of impeachment.
While Ratcliffe didn’t call for the outing of the whistleblower’s identity, other congressional Republicans — and Trump — pushed for it during the impeachment debate. Democrats and national security experts have raised concerns that the attacks on the whistleblower will have a chilling effect on future whistleblowers in the intelligence community.
At his confirmation hearing earlier this month, Ratcliffe argued that he wasn’t attacking the whistleblower, but rather was criticizing the Democrats’ rush to impeachment. He said he wanted to be clear “every whistleblower past, present, and future will enjoy every protection under the law.”
“My issue was not with the whistleblower; my issue was with what I perceived as a lack of due process in the House process,” Ratcliffe said. “I don’t want to re-litigate the issue so I will leave it at that, but every whistleblower can expect full protection under the law.”
Asked if Trump’s comments on the intelligence community hurt morale there, Ratcliffe told the Senate panel that he hoped they did not, but his goal was not going to be to fight old battles.
“I think the sentiment that I have heard from the President is it’s not intelligence community writ large, it is specific individuals and pointing to, you know, for instance, misuse of intelligence authorities by certain individuals,” Ratcliffe said. “But again, my focus is I want to look forward, not back. I think that is one of the reasons I want this opportunity.”
This story has been updated with additional developments Thursday.