Brittany Higgins has been grilled in court over the night she was allegedly raped, including questions about whether she had vomit stains on her dress.
The former Liberal staffer is the first witness in the criminal trial of Bruce Lehrmann, who she alleges sexually assaulted her in Parliament House after a boozy night out in March, 2019. Mr Lehrmann has pleaded not guilty.
On Friday morning, the fourth day of her high-profile rape trial, Ms Higgins was cross-examined by defence lawyer Steven Whybrow about what she told the Australian Federal Police on April 1.
‘Do you recall telling police you had gone to a medical centre and had tests done but no results have come back?’ Mr Whybrow asked.
Ms Higgins replied: ‘No. I had intention of going to medical centres, but the moment I left work I was collapsing.
‘I’d been raped days before. I was somehow making it to work in the same office I’d been raped in… I was by myself.’
Mr Whybrow continued: ‘Did you tell cops you had vomit stains all down your dress?’
‘I don’t recall. I was on my hands and knees on the ministers floor and I vomited into the minister’s toilet,’ Ms Higgins replied.
Mr Whybrow: ‘[Did you say you] became aware of the smell of sex?’
Ms Higgins: ‘Broadly accurate. I don’t remember the specific conversation, it was traumatising, but I believe those word to that effect.’
Mr Whybrow continued: ‘Might you have said to police that you had vomit stains all down your dress?’
Ms Higgins: ‘I had fallen over in the previous venue so I had grass stains on my dress and I vomited in the minister’s bathroom.’
Mr Whybrow then asked when Ms Higgins said she had grass stains on her dress, to which she told the court: ‘It has been widely reported I had grass stains on my dress.’
Ms Higgins said she could not remember whether she had vomit stains on her dress.
On Thursday, the court heard Ms Higgins secretly recorded a phone conversation with her former boss and then-employment minister Michaelia Cash in 2021, which she described as ‘the weirdest call of my life’.
Brittany Higgins is pictured (centre) outside court on Friday as she arrives for day four of her rape trial against her former colleague
Brittany Higgins told the court she secretly recorded a conversation with then-employment minister Michaelia Cash (pictured) in 2021
Ms Higgins initially worked for former defence minister Linda Reynolds, but took a job as a junior media advisor with Senator Cash after the 2019 election.
Ms Higgins, now 27, told the court under cross-examination that the senator was pretending she didn’t know about the alleged rape during the phone call – despite having spoken about it previously.
‘It was ridiculous. It was the weirdest phone call I have ever had in my life,’ she said.
Brittany Higgins (pictured) said the phone conversation she recorded with with then-employment minister Michaelia Cash was the ‘weirdest’ call she had ever had.
Defence lawyer Steven Whybrow put to Ms Higgins that she had sent the recording to multiple people, including journalists, to begin backgrounding for the story.
But Ms Higgins said it was for her legal protection, so she could corroborate her story.
‘I was trying to give [the recording] to as many people as possible to have them just so that they existed,’ she said.
‘It’s my word against a cabinet minister’s, and the power disparity between those two is ridiculous.’
Ms Higgins also recorded a conversation with Senator Cash’s former chief of staff Daniel Try without his knowledge and sent it to journalist Samantha Maiden, but stated it should not be published.
During that conversation, Ms Higgins told the court the chief of staff referred to another sexual assault within the Liberals that was never reported.
The court also heard Ms Higgins recorded the conversations after a six-hour interview with Lisa Wilkinson for The Project on February 2, 2021.
She said Ms Wilkinson and Ms Maiden were ‘fighting’ over when her story would be released.
‘Who got the exclusive drop so that come Walkley’s time, who could claim what and so it became not even about me or my story,’ she told the court.
Ms Maiden won the Gold Walkley in 2021 – Australian journalisms highest honour, while Ms Wilkinson was awarded a Logie this year.
Ms Higgins said Ms Wilkinson was ‘quite angry’ about the timing of their interview on The Project.
Former Liberal Party staffer Bruce Lehrmann arrives at the ACT Supreme Court in Canberra on Friday
Mr Whybrow put to her that she did the interview to hurt the Liberal party right before an election, but Ms Higgins said she simply wanted to talk about a ‘cultural problem’ within Parliament.
‘I thought I’d do one print and one TV and then I’d go back to uni and disappear,’ she explained.
Ms Higgins told the court The Project host was ‘quite angry’ when the interview was aired on February 15 because it was a Monday, and Ms Wilkinson did not typically work on Mondays.
After both stories dropped, Ms Higgins said she was inundated with media requests.
The court heard she prepared a timeline of events to give to police and, while she was ‘passed out on Valium’ due to the stress of the media whirlwind, her partner David Sharaz made the decision to give the timeline to two journalists.
Brittany Higgins recorded an interview with Lisa Wilkinson (pictured) for The Project in January 2021
Lisa Wilkinson (left) interviewed Brittany Higgins (right) on The Project in 2019 about her rape allegations
However, she claims the timeline ended up in the hands of ‘the whole press gallery’, and that Mr Sharaz regrets his decision.
Mr Whybrow also quizzed her over a series of inconsistencies in her original testimony, including what she did with the white cocktail dress she wore on the night of the alleged assault.
Ms Higgins initially told the court she put it in a bag under her bed for six months before she ‘symbolically washed it’ and wore it once more.
However, under cross-examination it was revealed the dress was only under her bed for a matter of weeks.
Mr Whybrow presented Ms Higgins with a photo of her in the dress at Ms Reynolds’ birthday celebration in Perth in April 2019 – less than two months after the alleged rape.
Ms Higgins conceded to the court that she ‘was wrong’, but maintained the dress was under her bed ‘for a period of time’.
The trial continues.