Ben Fordham has blasted the High Court after it ordered a dual national who was accused of fighting for Islamic State in Syria should have his Australian citizenship reinstated.
Speaking on his 2GB show on Thursday morning, Fordham said the case is Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s first ‘major test’ with dual-nationality Australians likely being given their citizenship back after the court found powers used by the government to cancel them were unconstitutional.
Turkish-Australian Delil Alexander, 35, is in jail in Syria after his Australian citizenship was removed on July 2 last year.
Australian intelligence said Alexander travelled to the country to join terror group ISIS, before being arrested by Kurdish forces after the organisation fell.
‘Have we gone mad? Anyone with links to this terrorist group has no place in our country,’ Fordham said on Thursday.
‘Because (Alexander) has never faced trial in Australia, and only committed terrorism overseas, we can’t strip his citizenship.’
Ben Fordham has blasted the High Court after it ordered a dual national who was accused of fighting for Islamic State in Syria should have his Australian citizenship reinstated
Alexander’s lawyers argued the Sydney-born man was in danger of ‘serious human rights violations’ including torture while imprisoned in Syria.
The High Court’s ruling could pave the way for 20 other Australians convicted of terrorism overseas to have their citizenship reinstated.
‘Anyone with links to terror groups have no right to live here, especially when they made the decision to leave Australia and fight for the enemy,’ Fordham said.
The government has other powers in their arsenal to keep dual nationals accused of terrorism overseas, including a temporary exclusion order that prevents them from coming to Australia for up to 10 years.
Fordham then spoke about the Islamic State terror attacks that have previously rocked Australia including the siege at Sydney’s Lindt Cafe in 2014 and the Melbourne stabbing terror attack in 2018.
‘(The government) must do everything in its powers to keep these freaks out of Australia and if the families want to say they weren’t radicalised well, what were they doing in Syria? They weren’t on a Contiki tour.’
‘Have we gone mad? Anyone with links to this terrorist group has no place in our country,’ Fordham said on Thursday
The High Court’s ruling could pave the way for 20 other Australians convicted of terrorism overseas to have their citizenship reinstated
A majority of the High Court found on Wednesday the citizenship stripping powers legislated by the former coalition government were invalid.
The court found it gave the former home affairs minister ‘the exclusively judicial function of adjudging and punishing criminal guilt’.
Fordham said the decision was ‘disgraceful’ and putting Australian lives at risk.
‘The court has ruled in favour of a man who was involved in a group who were planning to execute an innocent Aussie and chop off his head,’ the 2GB host said.
‘Let me say that again. The High Court, has backed the bloke, involved with Islamic State, part of a cell that wanted to execute an innocent Australian and behead them.’
The High Court of Australia (pictured) found the laws that gave the former home affairs minister power to cancel citizenship of a dual national had ‘punitive character’ and was unconstitutional
In 2018, Labor criticised the law change as likely to be found to be in breach of the constitution.
Two judges found the laws had a ‘punitive character’, conferring power on the minister ‘to cease citizenship as a sanction for past conduct, akin to historical forms of punishment, with significant consequences for the individual’, a summary of the judgment said.
However, it was found the section of the Citizenship Act giving the minister the power was supported by the constitution’s ‘aliens power’.
Four judges – Chief Justice Susan Kiefel, Patrick Keane, Jacqueline Gleeson and James Edelman – said part of the relief granted to the plaintiff should be a declaration he is an Australian citizen.
Justice Simon Steward said in his judgment the laws were valid, as there were sufficient safeguards in place.
‘(The section) was thus enacted, not as a punishment for a crime, but as a ‘political precaution’,’ he wrote.
It is understood Alexander and the other person will have their citizenship restored, but the decision will not impact on people held onshore.
Turkish-Australian Delil Alexander, 35, was imprisoned in Syria after his Australian citizenship was removed on July 2 last year when he was suspected of terrorist incursions and recruitment (stock image of an Australian passport)
Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus said in a statement he and Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil would examine the judgment and its implications in detail.
But he noted there was ‘no threat to Australia as a result of the decision’.
‘The Australian government has a range of measures available to manage the risk posed to Australians by individuals offshore including the temporary exclusion order regime which can prohibit an individual returning to Australia for up to two years,’ he said.
Alexander left Australia for Turkey on April 16, 2013, but just over two weeks later he was married in Syria.
ASIO assessed he joined terrorist group Islamic State by August 2013 – a qualified security assessment over which he has sought judicial review.
In November 2017, he was arrested by Kurdish militia in a place in Syria which was not a declared area under Australian terrorist laws.
Alexander was transferred to Syrian custody and given five years in jail for ‘unspecified offences under the Syrian Penal Code’.
He was pardoned in June last year, having served 18 months of his term.
Shortly after he was pardoned, the ASIO director-general provided classified advice to the then home affairs minister which did not recommend citizenship cancellation, the court heard.
However, the minister Karen Andrews stripped Alexander’s citizenship in July 2021.
Since then, he has been in Syrian intelligence custody and his family and lawyers have been unable to contact him, leading to his sister Berivan having to launch the legal action as a ‘litigation guardian’.
Government lawyers argued the minister met the three required conditions in the decision: a person has engaged in the requisite conduct; the conduct demonstrates the person has repudiated their allegiance to Australia; and it would be contrary to the public interest for them to remain an Australian citizen.
Former attorney-general Christian Porter, in introducing the changes in 2018, argued stripping Australian citizenship of people who sought to do the nation harm was an ‘an integral part of our ongoing response to international violent extremism and terrorism’.
Alexander’s lawyers argued the power to cancel the status of an Australian citizen is ‘inherently a domestic matter’ and should be reserved for a judge.
The court heard Alexander retains Turkish citizenship.